Hi @Brad Hunt
We've received your report regarding the schema mismatch issue after running the PrepareSchema
and PrepareAD
steps for CU15. We understand that some schema attributes, specifically auxiliaryClass
are showing duplicate values, and while you've resolved this on most Domain Controllers, one remote DC still has these duplicated values. We apologize for any inconvenience this has caused.
As a forum moderator, I'm here to offer guidance and point you toward reliable resources. While I can't directly access or perform technical operations on your system, I can provide a clear explanation of the issue and outline the standard steps for resolution.
The root of this problem lies in how Active Directory Schema objects, such as classSchema
(which includes the auxiliaryClass
attribute), are managed. Any modifications to these critical schema objects can only be performed directly on the Domain Controller holding the Schema Master FSMO (Flexible Single Master Operation) role. This is a fundamental design principle of Active Directory, ensuring that the schema remains consistent and authoritative across your entire forest. Attempting to directly edit these attributes on a Domain Controller that isn't the Schema Master simply won't work.
Your situation strongly suggests that the Active Directory replication process between your Schema Master and the problematic remote Domain Controller hasn't fully completed or is encountering an issue. The primary goal here is to ensure that this remote DC successfully receives the corrected schema information from your Schema Master.
Resolving this type of issue typically involves ensuring proper Active Directory replication. These actions require administrative privileges and should be performed by an experienced IT professional:
1. Identify the Schema Master
Determine which Domain Controller currently holds the Schema Master FSMO role in your environment.
Microsoft Docs Reference: Flexible Single Master Operations roles in Windows Server
2. Check Replication Health
Use tools like repadmin /showrepl
to verify the replication status between your Schema Master and the remote Domain Controller. This will help identify any replication errors that might be preventing the schema from synchronizing correctly.
Microsoft Docs Reference: Diagnose AD Replication Failures
3. Force Schema Replication
If no severe replication errors are found, your technical team may attempt to force replication of the Schema partition using repadmin /syncall
or repadmin /replicate
from the Schema Master to the affected Domain Controller.
Microsoft Docs Reference: Troubleshooting Active Directory Replication Problems
4. Verify the Schema
After attempting replication, it's crucial to re-check the auxiliaryClass
attribute on the remote Domain Controller using tools like repadmin /showattr
to confirm that the duplicate values have been successfully corrected.
For detailed assistance and direct intervention on your system, I strongly recommend reaching out to your internal IT team or a professional technical support provider specializing in Active Directory and Exchange Server. They have the necessary expertise and tools to accurately diagnose and safely implement the corrective actions.
For your complete understanding and to aid any technical team you engage, here's a curated list of relevant official Microsoft Learn documentation:
- Transfer or seize Operation Master roles in Active Directory Domain Services
- Active Directory FSMO roles in Windows
- Guidance for troubleshooting Active Directory replication
- Repadmin /showrepl
- Repadmin /replicate
- Repadmin /showattr
I hope this detailed explanation and the provided resources will help you navigate this issue effectively. Please let me know if you have any further questions as you proceed.
If the answer is helpful, please click "Accept Answer" and kindly upvote it. If you have extra questions about this answer, please click "Comment".
Note: Please follow the steps in our documentation to enable e-mail notifications if you want to receive the related email notification for this thread.